[Aide] AIDE configuration taking too long

Mason Nakadomari nakadoma at hawaii.edu
Thu Aug 29 21:09:34 EEST 2013


Meaning I will see if my scans go faster without those directories but I'd
still like to scan those directories in a way to make it faster. It
shouldn't be impossible to scan those directories should it?
On Aug 29, 2013 8:08 AM, "Mason Nakadomari" <nakadoma at hawaii.edu> wrote:

> Hi we are using fibre channel and sas disks off a vmware cluster. So I'm
> not sure that would be a problem. Any recommendations on what in particular
> to exclude from /proc /sys /dev. We don't want to exclude all of those
> directories. I will try to see if that is my problem.
> On Aug 29, 2013 3:55 AM, "Marc Haber" <mh+aide at zugschlus.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:53:01PM -1000, Mason Nakadomari wrote:
>> > We figured that the removal of a checksum would help performance
>>
>> No. aide is almost always disk-bound, computing the checksum happens
>> in negligible time on today's system. You're waiting for your disk,
>> nothing else.
>>
>> Run aide with a higher verbosity level and check whether it is hanging
>> in /dev, /proc or /sys. I'd exclude those directories without much
>> thinking.
>>
>> Greetings
>> Marc
>>
>> --
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im
>> Header
>> Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621
>> 31958061
>> Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621
>> 31958062
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aide mailing list
>> Aide at cs.tut.fi
>> https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/pipermail/aide/attachments/20130829/a91ff07b/attachment.html 


More information about the Aide mailing list